U.S. Grand Strategy in East Asia

Hello Fellows,


My name is Joseph Singh. I am a Government major and Public Policy minor at Dartmouth College. My thesis will study the impact of major shift in U.S. grand strategy — from deep engagement to off-shore balancing — on the strategic environment in East Asia.


I grew up fascinated by international relations. I came of age at a time when the public focus turned from an inward to decidedly outward focus. During the 1990s, foreign policy was a marginal concern for most, with huminitarian interventions momentarily dotting the screens of the evening news. Even George W. Bush, when campaigning during the 2000 elections, said little about foreign policy. Some characterized his foreign policy stance as isolationist in response. 


Everything change after 9/11. All I can remember as a child was war and international politics as I watched the news with my mother or heard elders talking politics over dinner. In turn, the enormous costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the dire fiscal situation in the United States, have caused a new surge in scholarship about America’s current grand strategy. Should it stay the course and stay deeply engaged in the world? Should it keep its dozens of alliances and security commitments, its robust basing presence overseas and continue to spend large sums of money on defense? Can it still pursue its interests (perhaps even more effectively) with a retrenched presence abroad, and one which relies on fewer alliances and bases, and more heavily on off-shore balancing power? 


The political science literature is full of reasoned and thoughtful opinions on the merits of each side. But the arguments have been mostly theoretical. Some posit that retrenchment will cause greater instability. As the U.S. retreats from regions like East Asia, arms races will spur and conflict may become more likely. Others posit that the current grand strategy makes conflict more likely because America’s overwhelming military power causes adversaries to “balance against” it. But none of these theories has been robustly tested. My paper seeks to draw out a hypothetical scenario in which the United States partially retrenches from East Asia and test the impact of this withdrawal on public support for various security strategies in Japan and Korea. For instance, would Koreans be more likely to support developing nuclear weapons without American security commitments? In turn, I hope for this paper to shed some empirical light on the robust, but principally theoretical grand strategy debate. 

This entry was posted in 2013-2014 Paper Topics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to U.S. Grand Strategy in East Asia

  1. enwill7144 says:

    Joseph- I am really excited about your research topic. I have an interest in U.S. diplomatic relations in Southeast Asia, but that interest focuses mainly on the Cold War era. I look forward to hearing about your research and the progression of your paper, particularly your thoughts for future U.S. interests in the region.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s