Local Procurement for Foreign Food Aid

Picking a topic last fall, my train of thought went something like this: “Well, I really like food. And food policy. But I think I’d really like to do something related to U.S. foreign relations… Foreign food aid?” Though chosen somewhat randomly, it turns out this has proved to be a very timely topic. Practically since food aid was first established by PL 480 (“Food for Peace”) in 1954, there has been a conflict in American motives. What is the purpose of food aid – to feed hungry people or to promote American business? What does the U.S. gain from providing food aid? If the benefits for America were minimal or intangible, would we continue doing it?

This debate continues today. The United States is the last major donor country to still use a “tied” food aid system, in which its donations are tied to the U.S. economy. Although we provide more aid than other country, it comes with strings attached – for example, the majority of the food must originate from the United States and 75% of it must be shipped on American carriers. This usually means that the food aid we send is less efficient and less effective. For example, the cost of shipping on American carriers can take up to 40% of the food aid funding. Furthermore, once received, the food might be culturally inappropriate or cause disincentive effects that ruin the local agricultural systems. In recent years, there have been several attempts to change this system to resemble the model used by Canada or the EU. These donors do not require actual commodities to be sent abroad; instead, they use cash donations that allow the recipient NGOs to fund agricultural production programs closer to the area in need.

While there are still potential pitfalls in such local procurement practices, this system seems to be a better approach for solving chronic hunger issues. Although the U.S. has yet to commit much funding in this direction, a pilot program was developed under the 2008 Farm Bill. Initial reports from Burkina Faso and Niger look promising and an independent evaluation of the program is due later this year. Although I expect the report will not be available until after the final paper is due, I am eager to read what results come back in favor of or against local procurement.


About emmacquinn

I'm a junior at the U.S. Naval Academy, majoring in political science with a minor in Arabic. For my research, I have chosen to focus on food aid programs because the topic combines food and foreign policy, as well as the philosophy underlying humanitarian assistance. I am a member of the Naval Academy Triathlon Team and hope to be commissioned as an officer in the Marine Corps upon graduation.
This entry was posted in 2012-2013 General. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s